RESEARCH PAPER
Effect of preoperative flexion contracture in the knee joint on the accuracy of digital templating before knee replacement surgery
More details
Hide details
1
Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
2
University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
3
Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Riga, Latvia
Submission date: 2014-06-11
Acceptance date: 2016-01-13
Online publication date: 2016-02-11
Publication date: 2020-03-23
Corresponding author
Janis Timsans
Franssintie 5 E 30, 61300 Kurikka, Finland. Tel.: +371 29119198.
Pol. Ann. Med. 2016;23(1):26-29
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Flexion contracture in the knee joint before knee replacement surgery has been implicated as one of the factors that could affect the accuracy of digital templating.
Aim:
The aim of the study was to detect the accuracy of digital templating in predicting the size of knee implants and to detect the effect of preoperative flexion contracture in the knee joint on the accuracy of digital templating.
Material nad methods:
The flexion contracture of the knee joint was measured in every patient prior to knee replacement surgery and digital templating of the knee joint was made in mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP) and AP long leg views. The sizes of prosthetic components predicted by templating were compared to the sizes of prosthetic components implanted during the surgery. The effect of flexion contracture on the accuracy of digital templating was analyzed using χ2 test and Mann–Whitney U test.
Results and discussion:
The size of the prosthetic component predicted by templating matched the size of the implanted component in 45.2%–62.9% of the cases, in 91.9%–98.4% of the cases it was within the range of one size. Statistically significant effect of the flexion contracture in the knee joint on the accuracy of digital templating was observed in the femoral component, AP view if the flexion contracture exceeded 10°.
Conclusions:
Digital templating is very accurate method in predicting the size of knee implants. Flexion contracture in the knee joint that exceeds 10° diminishes the accuracy of digital templating of the femoral component in AP view.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No conflict of interest to declare.
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Miller AG, Purtill JJ. Accuracy of digital templating in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2012;41(11):510–512.
2.
Schwartz Jr JT, Mayer JG, Engh CA. Femoral fracture during non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(8):1135–1142.
3.
Blackley HR, Howell GE, Rorabeck CH. Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect. 2000;49:3–11.
4.
Capello WN. Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1986;35:249–257.
5.
Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio RA. Comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;464:179–183.
6.
Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M. Reliability of preoperative arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70(6):560–564.
7.
Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C. Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010;33(11):797.
8.
The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(1):78–84.
9.
Trickett RW, Hodgson P, Forster MC, Robertson A. The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):903–906.
10.
Zadorožnijs S, Kalnberzs K. The reliability and accuracy of knee implants sizing predicted by digital templating. Acta Chir Latvien. 2012;12(1):29–31.
11.
Unnanuntana A, Arunakul M, Unnanuntana A. The accuracy of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90(11):2338–2343.
12.
Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: trial by template. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:90–94.