Current issue
Journal content
Articles in press
Archive
About the Journal
About the Polish Annals of Medicine
Editorial Board
Abstracting & indexing
Open Access policy
Charges
Affiliated institutions
Contact
Instructions
Peer review process
Guide for authors
Publication ethics
Ethics and Patient Consent
User License
Usage of third party materials
Disclaimer
Statement on Artificial Intelligence
Reviewers
Guide for reviewers
Review Form
REVIEW PAPER
Intervention studies on scoliosis – Review of the reviews
1
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Services, Gesundheitsforum Nahetal, Germany
Submission date: 2011-11-28
Acceptance date: 2012-01-05
Publication date: 2020-04-10
Corresponding author
Hans-Rudolf Weiss
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Services, Alzeyer Str. 23, D-55457 Gensingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 6727 894040; fax: +49 6727 8940429.
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Services, Alzeyer Str. 23, D-55457 Gensingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 6727 894040; fax: +49 6727 8940429.
Pol. Ann. Med. 2012;19(1):72-83
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The treatment of scoliosis is still a matter of debate. Although certain systematic reviews exist, neither the surgical nor the conservative community seems to acknowledge the evidence which has been gained thus far.
Aim:
The aim of this review was to highlight the knowledge concerning the conservative and the operative approach in order to provide the clinician with a clear view concerning the current alternatives.
Material and methods:
A PubMed search for outcome papers and reviews concerning the treatment of scoliosis has been performed in order to detect approaches with beneficial outcomes with respect to the Cobb angle, trunk deformity and other signs and symptoms of scoliosis.
Discussion:
Real outcome papers (beginning of treatment in immature samples, and final results after the end of growth) have been found for brace treatment only. Some papers investigated mid-term effects of exercises, most were retrospective, few prospective and many included patient samples with questionable treatment indications. The papers on surgery do not seem to provide evidence enough to establish a beneficial cost and benefit relationship for the patient.
Conclusions:
Physiotherapy in the treatment of scoliosis does not seem to be of evidence enough in the treatment of patients at risk for being progressive. Brace treatment is supported by Level II evidence with studies providing end-growth results and long-term results as well. Surgical treatment cannot be regarded as being evidence based.
The treatment of scoliosis is still a matter of debate. Although certain systematic reviews exist, neither the surgical nor the conservative community seems to acknowledge the evidence which has been gained thus far.
Aim:
The aim of this review was to highlight the knowledge concerning the conservative and the operative approach in order to provide the clinician with a clear view concerning the current alternatives.
Material and methods:
A PubMed search for outcome papers and reviews concerning the treatment of scoliosis has been performed in order to detect approaches with beneficial outcomes with respect to the Cobb angle, trunk deformity and other signs and symptoms of scoliosis.
Discussion:
Real outcome papers (beginning of treatment in immature samples, and final results after the end of growth) have been found for brace treatment only. Some papers investigated mid-term effects of exercises, most were retrospective, few prospective and many included patient samples with questionable treatment indications. The papers on surgery do not seem to provide evidence enough to establish a beneficial cost and benefit relationship for the patient.
Conclusions:
Physiotherapy in the treatment of scoliosis does not seem to be of evidence enough in the treatment of patients at risk for being progressive. Brace treatment is supported by Level II evidence with studies providing end-growth results and long-term results as well. Surgical treatment cannot be regarded as being evidence based.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author is advisor of Koob-Scolitech, 55564 Abtweiler, Germany.
REFERENCES (82)
1.
Appelgren G, Willner S. End vertebra angle – a roentgenographic method to describe a scoliosis. A follow-up study of idiopathic scoliosis treated with the Boston brace. Spine. 1990;15(2):71–74.
2.
Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis. 2006;1(1):2.
3.
Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, et al. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine. 2009;34(20):2171–2178.
4.
den Boer WA, Anderson PG, Limbeek J, Kooijman MA. Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with side-shift therapy: an initial comparison with a brace treatment historical cohort. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(5):406–410.
5.
Campos M, Dolan L, Weinstein S. Unanticipated revision surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2012;37(12):1048–1053.
6.
Castro Jr. FP. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the Hueter–Volkmann principle. Spine J. 2003;3(3):180–185.
7.
Cho SK, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Yi JS, Pahys JM, Zebala LP, et al. Major complications in revision adult deformity surgery: risk factors and clinical outcomes with two- to seven-year follow-up. Spine 2012;37(6):489–500.
8.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Sangole A, Labelle H, Parent S. Correlation between immediate in-brace correction and biomechanical effectiveness of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2010;35(18):1706–1713.
9.
Coillard C, Vachon V, Circo AB, Beause´jour M, Rivard CH. Effectiveness of the SpineCor brace based on the new standardized criteria proposed by the scoliosis research society for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007;27(4):375–379.
10.
Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, Nachemson AL. A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity. Spine. 2007;32(20):2198–2207.
11.
Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study – part II. Spine. 2003;28(18):373–383.
12.
Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine. 2001;26(13):1449–1456.
13.
Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. Spine. 2001;26(5):516–525.
14.
Danielsson AJ, Romberg K, Nachemson AL. Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine. 2006;31(3):275–283.
15.
Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson K, Nachemson AL. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(4):278–288.
16.
Dickson JH, Mirkovic S, Noble PC, Nalty T, Erwin WD. Results of operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995;77(4):513–523.
17.
Dolan LA, Weinstein SL. Surgical rates after observation and bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an evidence-based review. Spine. 2007;32(19):91–100.
18.
Duconge P. La rèèducation de la scoliose. Mythè ou rèalitè?. Rèsonance Europeennes Du Rachis. 2002:1229–1236.
19.
Edelmann P. Brace treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 1992;58(1):85–90.
20.
Emans JB, Kaelin A, Bancel P, Hall JE, Miller ME. The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up results in 295 patients. Spine. 1986;11(8):792–801.
21.
Ferraro C, Masiero S, Venturin A. Effect of exercise therapy on mild idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Medicophys. 1998;34:25–31.
22.
Fusco C, Zaina F, Atanasio S, Romano M, Negrini A, Negrini S. Physical exercises in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an updated systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(1):80–114.
23.
Ganjavian MS, Behtash H, Ameri E, Khakinahad M. Results of Milwaukee and Boston braces with or without metal marker around pads in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(9):598–605.
24.
Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Shaffrey CI, Polly DW, Ondra SL, Berven SH, Bridwell KH. The costs and benefits of non-operative management for adult scoliosis. Spine. 2010;35(5):578–582.
25.
Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and prognosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;91:59–63.
26.
Goldberg CJ, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of brace treatment on incidence of surgery. Spine. 2001;26(1):42–47.
27.
Hawes MC. Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9(4):318–339.
28.
Hawes MC, O’Brien JP. A century of spine surgery: what can patients expect?. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):808–817.
29.
Hawes MC. The use of exercises in the treatment of scoliosis: an evidence-based critical review of the literature. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):171–182.
30.
Hasler CC, Wietlisbach S, Büchler P. Objective compliance of adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis in a dynamic Spine-Cor brace. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(3):211–218.
31.
Hopf C, Heine J. Long-term results of the conservative treatment of scoliosis using the Cheˆneau brace. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1985;123(3):312–322.
32.
Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Tantorski M, Cahill P, Nydick J, Fine A, et al. Cervical sagittal plane decompensation after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an effect imparted by post-operative thoracic hypokyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15(5):491–496.
33.
Landauer F, Wimmer C, Behensky H. Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):201–207.
34.
Lange JE, Steen H, Gunderson R, Brox JI. Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in late-onset juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2011;6:18.
35.
Li G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Fu E, Wang S, Xia Q, et al. Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up. Spine. 2009;34(20):2165–2170.
36.
Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1984;66(7):1061–1071.
37.
Maruyama T, Grivas TB, Kaspiris A. Effectiveness and outcomes of brace treatment: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(1):26–42.
38.
Maruyama T, Kitagawa T, Takeshita K, Mochizuki K, Nakamura K. Conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can it reduce the incidence of surgical treatment?. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):215–219.
39.
Maruyama T, Kitagawa T, Takeshita K, Nakainura K. Side shift exercise for idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;91:361–364.
40.
Maruyama T, Matsushita T, Takeshita K, Kitagawa K, Nakamura K, Kurokawa T. Side shift exercises for idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2003;85B(suppl 1):89.
41.
Mollon G, Rodot J. Scolioses structurales mineures et kinèsitherapie. Etude statistique compareative des rèsultas. Kinesithérapie Scientifique. 1986;15:47–56.
42.
Mooney V, Gulick J, Pozos R. A preliminary report on the effect of measured strength training in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13(2):102–107.
43.
Nachemson AL, Peterson LE. Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1995;77(6):815–822.
44.
Negrini S, Atanasio S, Negrini F, Zaina F, Marchini G. The Sforzesco brace can replace cast in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a controlled prospective cohort study. Scoliosis. 2008;31(3):15.
45.
Negrini S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M, Parzini S, Negrini A. End-growth results of bracing and exercises for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prospective worst-case analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:395–408.
46.
Negrini S, Fusco C, Minozzi S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M. Exercises reduce the progression rate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):772–785.
47.
Negrini S, Negrini A, Romano M, Verzini N, Parzini S. A controlled prospective study on the efficacy of SEAS.02 exercises in preventing progression and bracing in mild idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;123:523–526.
48.
Negrini S, Zaina F, Romano M, Negrini A, Parzini S. Specific exercises reduce brace prescription in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective controlled cohort study with worstcase analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(6):451–455.
49.
Otman S, Kose N, Yakut Y. The efficacy of Schroth’s 3-dimensional exercise therapy in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2005;26(9):1429–1435.
50.
Rigo M. 3D Correction of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using Chêneau brace. In: Stokes IA, Dangerfield P, eds. Research into Spinal Deformities 2. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1999:362–365.
51.
Rigo M. Radiological and cosmetic improvement 2 years after brace weaning – a case report. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):195–199.
52.
Rigo M, Reiter C, Weiss H-R. Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):209–214.
53.
Rigo M, Quera-Salva G, Puigdevall N. Effect of the exclusive employment of physiotherapy in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. In: World Confederation for Physical Therapy: Proceedings Book of the 11th International Congress of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy. London; 1991:1319–1321.
54.
Rigo M, Weiss H-R. Korsettversorgungsstrategien in der Skoliosebehandlung. In: Weiss H-R, ed. Wirbelsä ulendeformitäten – Konservatives Management. Munich: Pflaum; 2003.
55.
Rowe DE, Bernstein SM, Riddick MF, Adler F, Emans JB, Gardner-Bonneau D. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1997;79(5):664–674.
56.
Stone B, Beekman C, Hall V, Guess V, Brooks HL. The effect of an exercise program on change in curve in adolescents with minimal idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary study. Phys Ther. 1979;59(6):759–763.
57.
Sun X, Wang B, Qiu Y, Zhu ZZ, Zhu F, Yu Y, et al. Outcomes and predictors of brace treatment for girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Surg. 2010;2(4):285–290.
58.
Thompson GH, Richards Iii BS. Inclusion and assessment criteria for conservative scoliosis treatment. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:157–163.
59.
Wan L, Wang G-X, Bian R. Exercise therapy in treatment of essential S-shaped scoliosis: evaluation of Cobb angle in breast and lumbar segment through a follow-up of half a year. Chin J Clin Rehabil. 2005;9(34):82–84.
60.
Weiss H-R. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) – an indication for surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):799–807.
61.
Weiss H-R. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis – case report of a patient with clinical deterioration after surgery. Patient Saf Surg. 2007;1:7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754....
62.
Weiss H-R. Best Practice in Conservative Scoliosis Care. 3rd. ed. Munich: Pflaum; 2010.
63.
Weiss H-R. Best Practice in Conservative Scoliosis Care. 4th ed. Munich: Pflaum; 2012.
64.
Weiss H-R. Brace technology thematic series – the Gensingen braceTM in the treatment of scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2010;13(5):22.
65.
Weiss H-R. Clinical improvement and radiological progression in a girl with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated conservatively – a case report. Scoliosis. 2006;26(1):13.
66.
Weiss H-R. Debate on: Bracing in Adolescent Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST) – will the expenditure pay?. Scoliosis. 2009;4(suppl 2):O43.
67.
Weiss H-R, Goodall D. Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery – a systematic review of the PubMed literature. Scoliosis. 2008;5(3):9.
68.
Weiss H-R, Goodall D. The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(2):177–193.
70.
Weiss H-R, Negrini S, Rigo M, Kotwicki T, Hawes MC, Grivas TB, et al. Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (SOSORT guidelines). Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;135:164–170.
71.
Weiss H-R, Rigo M. Expert-driven Chêneau applications: description and in-brace corrections. Physiother Theory Pract. 2011;27(1):61–67.
72.
Weiss H-R, Santos Leal E, Hammelbeck U. Proposal for the SOSORT inclusion criteria for studies on physiotherapy. Paper Presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the SOSORT. Barcelone; 2011.
73.
Weiss H-R, Weiss G. Brace treatment during pubertal growth spurt in girls with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) – a prospective trial comparing two different concepts. Pediatr Rehabil. 2005;8(3):199–206.
74.
Weiss H-R, Weiss G, Petermann F. Incidence of curvature progression in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with scoliosis in-patient rehabilitation (SIR): an age- and sex-matched controlled study. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(1):23–30.
75.
Weiss H-R, Werkmann M. Brace technology thematic series – the ScoliOlogiC® Cheneau lightTM brace in the treatment of scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2010;5:1.
76.
Weiss H-R, Werkmann M, Stephan C. Brace related stress in scoliosis patients – comparison of different concepts of bracing. Scoliosis. 2007;20(2):10.
77.
Weiss H-R, Werkmann M, Stephan C. Correction effects of the ScoliOlogiC ‘‘Chêneau light’’ brace in patients with scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2007;26(2):2.
78.
Werkmann M, Weiss H-R. Rate of surgery in patients under treatment with a Chêneau light brace using the SRS inclusion criteria. Paper Presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the SOSORT. Barcelone; 2011.
79.
Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lam TP, Ng BK, Sin SW, Lee-Shum SL, et al. The effect of rigid versus flexible spinal orthosis on the clinical efficacy and acceptance of the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2008;33(12):1360–1365.
80.
Wong MS, Cheng JC, Lo KH. A comparison of treatment effectiveness between the CAD/CAM method and the manual method for managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29(1):105–111.
81.
Zaborowska-Sapeta K, Kowalski IM, Kotwicki T, Protasiewicz-Fałdowska H, Kiebzak W. Effectiveness of Cheneau brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis: prospective study in 79 patients followed to skeletal maturity. Scoliosis. 2011;6(1):2.
82.
Zaborowska-Sapeta K, Kowalski IM, Protasiewicz-Fałdowska H, Wolska O. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Chêneau brace treatment for idiopatic scoliosis – own observations. Pol Ann Med. 2010;17(1):44–53.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
