REVIEW PAPER
Medical aspects of insanity in Polish Criminal Law
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
 
2
Department of Substantive Criminal Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2013-11-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2014-04-03
 
 
Online publication date: 2014-04-30
 
 
Publication date: 2020-03-26
 
 
Corresponding author
Kamil Frąckowiak   

Department of Substantive Criminal Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Warszawska 98, 10-900 Olsztyn, Poland. Tel.: +48 509954574.
 
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2014;21(1):69-73
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Insanity is an issue at the border between two different fields of science: law and medicine. Medicine is a widely developed field that undergoes continuous and dynamic development. On the other hand, legal aspects of medicine are based on classical medical solutions adopted already in the 19th century science. Insanity is a strictly legal term. Definition of this term is an extremely important aspect for the application of Art. 31 of the Penal Code, since its interpretation determines criminal liability, and in consequence the use of criminal penalties or security measures.

Aim:
The aim of this work was to present the issue of insanity in respect to the Polish Criminal Law and current medical knowledge.

Material and methods:
Dogmatic-legal analysis of the current legal regulations in Poland through the prism of well-established Supreme Court jurisprudence and literature of the field was conducted.

Results and discussion:
Recently, the condition for liability of a perpetrator for a criminal act is guilt, which in certain circumstances may be excluded. Culpability does not occur inter alia in situations where the state of mind of the perpetrator shows some deficiency. A Polish legislator provides three sources of insanity: mental illness, mental retardation, and other mental disturbance activities. Two psychological criteria of the very state are also defined, which at the same time are the consequences of the above-mentioned sources: inability to recognize the significance of the act and inability to manage its conduct.

Conclusions:
The issue of insanity requires effective combination of complex and suitable legal structures, current medical knowledge, and interest of an individual and society. For the effective and accurate regulations of the issue of insanity and well-functioning practice, a dialog between the two professions is required. Specifying the term of insanity is the responsibility of physicians, since its clarification on the basis of current legal status is unreasonable and inadequate due to the fact that its extent is each time determined by the current medical knowledge.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Act of 6 June 1997, Penal Code. (Journal of Laws of 1997 No. 88, item. 553, as amended).
 
2.
Act of 6 June 1997, Code of Criminal Procedure. (Journal of Laws of 1997 No. 89, item. 555, as amended).
 
3.
Andrejew I. Polskie prawo karne w zarysie [Polish Criminal Law Outline]. Warszawa: PWN; 1989:190.
 
4.
Cieślak M. Polskie prawo karne-zarys systemowego ujęcia [Polish Criminal Law – an outline for the systematic approach]. Warszawa: PWN; 1995:293–295.
 
5.
Marek A. Prawo karne [Criminal Law]. Warszawa: CH Beck; 2011:135.
 
6.
Gardocki L. Prawo karne [Criminal Law]. Warszawa: CH Beck; 2013:55.
 
7.
Tarnawski M. Zmniejszona poczytalność sprawcy przestępstwa [Diminished Sanity of a Perpetrator of a Crime]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze; 1976:5,6,71.
 
8.
Supreme Court judgment of 14 March 1974, II KR 239/73, OSNKW 1974, z. 7–8, item 144.
 
9.
Cieślak M, Spett K, Wolter W. Psychiatria w procesie karnym [Psychiatry in the Criminal Action]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze; 1993:21–24.
 
10.
Supreme Court judgment of 13 January 1978, V KR 183/1977, OSNPG 1978, z. 7, item. 76.
 
11.
Rutkowski R. Kontrowersje w sprawie odpowiedzialności karnej osób z zaburzeniami psychicznymi [Controversy on the criminal liability of individuals with mental disorders]. In: Materiały VII Krajowej Konferencji Sekcji Psychiatrii Sądowej PTP ,,Teoria i nauka oceny poczytalności’’ [Materials from the 6th National Conference of the Forensic Psychiatry Section of Polish Psychiatric Association ‘‘Theory and learning the assessment of sanity’’]. Warszawa: PTP; 1988:19–20.
 
12.
Golonka A. Niepoczytalność i poczytalność ograniczona [Insanity and Diminished Sanity]. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer; 2013:63–64.
 
13.
Pietrzyk A. Psychologiczne kryteria niepoczytalności i poczytalności zmniejszonej – refleksje biegłego psychologa dla prawników [Psychological criteria of insanity and diminished sanity – reflections of expert psychologist for lawyers]. Palestra. 1993;12:92–93.
 
14.
Gordon T. Spory o interpretację pojęcia poczytalności i jego kliniczną weryfikację [Disputes on the interpretation of sanity and its clinical verification]. In: Materiały VII Krajowej Konferencji Sekcji Psychiatrii Sądowej PTP ,,Teoria i nauka oceny poczytalności’’ [Materials from the 6th National Conference of the Forensic Psychiatry Section of Polish Psychiatric Association ‘‘Theory and learning the assessment of sanity’’]. Warszawa: PTP; 1988:98–99.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top