REVIEW PAPER
Movement pattern and muscle balance as a source of lumbar spine health according to the concept of Kinetic Control
 
More details
Hide details
1
Fisio-Sports.es, Spain
 
2
Fizjo-Sport.pl, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2014-03-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2014-06-02
 
 
Online publication date: 2014-08-15
 
 
Publication date: 2020-04-06
 
 
Corresponding author
Michał Hadała   

Nauki Stosowane w Sporcie, Stokrotek 10, 35-604 Rzeszów, Poland. Tel.: +34 617 688 198.
 
 
Pol. Ann. Med. 2014;21(2):152-157
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Since the beginning of the 21st century rehabilitation has developed rapidly, however still many patients report problems of the musculoskeletal system.

Aim:
The aim of the study was to analyse motor control of the lumbar spine according to different movement patterns and chooses the best exercise for abnormal movement patterns.

Material and methods:
The lumbar spine is a region with reference to which patients most often report pain. Pain sensations are most often induced by mechanical overloads. In order to prevent such overloads and treat the pain, it is significant to assess various movement patterns.

Results:
The concept of Kinetic Control allows analysing the movement patterns thoroughly, with the use of the assessment of the direction control for flexion, extension and rotation movement.

Discussion:
Clinical indication is for people with symptoms and those who still have not reported the lumbar spine pain to work in order to regain correct movement timing during such a global movement. It is often advisable to work at the same time towards controlling the direction of movement, regaining optimal elasticity of multi-joint structures and restoring proper segmental stabilisation. Identifying a dysfunction of the musculoskeletal system early enough, it is possible to avoid pathologies and pain in patients, simultaneously minimising the risk of irreversible structural changes.

Conclusions:
The loss of motor control is related to the low back pain, and is a good diagnostic tool. Important is the choice of motor control exercises for a particular direction of motion.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL. Kinetic Control the Management of Uncontrolled Movement. Australia: Elsevier; 2012.
 
2.
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL. Functional stability re-training: principles and strategies for managing mechanical dysfunction. Man Ther. 2001;6(1):3–14.
 
3.
Comerford MJ, Mottram SL. Movement and stability dysfunction – contemporary developments. Man Ther. 2001;6(1):15–26.
 
4.
Gniewek T, Gryckiewicz Sz., Hadała M. The role of transversus abdominis in local stability training based on Kinetic Control. Prakt Fizjot Rehabil. 2012;5:4–12.
 
5.
Ferreira P, Ferreira M, Maher C, Refshauge K, Herbert RD, Hodges P. Changes in recruitment of transversus abdominis correlate with disability in people with chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(16):1166–1172.
 
6.
Hodges P, Richardson C. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: a motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine. 1996;21(22):2640–2650.
 
7.
Lee D. Pelvic Girdle. DB Publishing; 2001.
 
8.
Hides J, Jull G, Richardson C. Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for first-episode low back pain. Spine. 2001;26(11):243–248.
 
9.
Hodges P, Gandevia S. Activation of the human diaphragm during a repetitive postural task. J Physiol. 2000;522:165–175.
 
10.
Hodges P, Gandevia S. Changes in intra-abdominal pressure during postural and respiratory activation of the human diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:967–976.
 
11.
Sapsford R, Hodges P. The effect of abdominal and pelvic floor muscle activation on urine flow in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(9):1225–1230.
 
12.
Sapsford R, Hodges P, Richardson C, Cooper D, Markwell S, Jull G. Co-activation of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles during voluntary exercises. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001;20(1):31–42.
 
13.
Sapsford R, Richardson C, Maher C, Hodges P. Pelvic floor muscle activity in different sitting postures in continent and incontinent women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1741–1747.
 
14.
Protasiewicz-Fałdowska H, Wiśniewska T, Zaborowska- Sapeta K, Kowalski IM, Kiebzak W. The influence of specialist kinesiotherapy on the spinal function after fenestration surgeries. Pol Ann Med. 2010;17(1):36–43.
 
15.
Hadała M. Functional stabilising training in motor dysfunction according to the modern concept of Kinetic Control. Prakt Fizjot Rehabil. 2011;6:52–56.
 
16.
Wiśniewska T, Protasiewisz-Fałdowska H, Pliszka M. The effect of comprehensive rehabilitation on correcting muscle imbalance in rural children from the Warmia and Mazury region. Pol Ann Med. 2012;19(1):27–31.
 
17.
Adams M, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P. Biomechanics of Back Pain. Warszawa: DB Publishing; 2010.
 
18.
Dickx N, Cagnie B, Parlevliet T, Lavens A, Danneels L. The effect of unilateral muscle pain on recruitment of the lumbar multifidus during automatic contraction. An experimental pain study. Man Ther. 2010;15(4):364–369.
 
19.
Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.
 
20.
Hamilton C, Richardson C. Active control of the neural lumbopelvic posture: a comparison between back pain and non-back pain subjects. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Tilsher H, Dorman T, Snijders C, eds. In: 3rd Interdisciplinary World Congress on Low Back Pain and Pelvic PainVienna, Austria 1998.
 
21.
Luomajoki H, Kool J, de Bruin DE, Airaksinen O. Movement control tests of the low back; evaluation of the difference between patients with low back pain and healthy controls. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2008;9:170–172.
 
22.
Vad Dillen L, Sahrmann S, Wagner J. Classification, intervention, and outcomes for a person with lumbar rotation with flexion syndrome. Phys Ther. 2005;85(4):336–351.
 
23.
Dickx N, Cagnie B, Achten E, Vandemaele P, Parlevliet T, Danneels L. Differentiation between deep and superficial fibers of the lumbag multifidus by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:122–128.
 
24.
Dickx N, Cagnie B, Achten E, Vandemaele P, Parlevliet T, Danneels L. Changes in lumbar muscle activity because of induced muscle pain evaluated by muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 2008;33(26):983–989.
 
25.
Dziak A. Pain and Lower Back Pathology. Kraków: Medicina Sportiva; 2007.
 
26.
Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen J, Korsholm L, de Leboeuf YC. Are MRI-defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain? BMC Med. 2007;5:2.
 
27.
MacDonald D, Moseley L, Hodges P. Why do some patients keep hurting their back? Evidence of ongoing back muscle dysfunction during remission from recurrent back pain. Pain. 2009;142(3):183–188.
 
28.
Nelson-Wong E, Alex B, Csepe D, Lancaster D, Callaghan J. Altered muscle recruitment during extension from trunk flexion in low back pain developers. Clin Biomech. 2012;27:994–998.
 
29.
Van Dillen L, Sahrmann S, Norton B, Caldwell C, McDonnell M, Bloom N. Movement system impairment-based categories for low back pain: stage 1 validation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(3):126–142.
 
30.
Van Dillen L, Maluf K, Sahrmann S. Further examination of modifying patient-preferred movement and alignment strategies in patients with low back pain during symptomatic tests. Man Ther. 2009;14(1):52–60.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top